Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tareq Jabr v. Ohio Department of Taxation, et al
as 23-3881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAREQ R. JABR
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF OHIO, and Dave Yost, CITY OF COLUMBUS, OH and others
Keith v. Yezzo, et al
as 1:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kevin Keith
Defendant:
Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation, Bucyrus Police Department , Daniel Cappy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Notoweega Nation, et al v. OH, et al
as 16-4060
Plaintiff:
NOTOWEEGA NATION, by its Chief, Great Elk Dancer For His Elk Nation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREAT ELK DANCER FOR HIS ELK NATION, as Representative of the Class of Notoweega Persons
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, MIKE DEWINE, in his Official Capacity, OHIO BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION and others
Notoweega Nation et al v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Notoweega Nation and Chief, Great Elk Dancer For His Elk Nation
Defendant:
State of Ohio , Mike DeWine , Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prade v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Douglas Prade
Defendant:
City of Akron, Mary Myers, Ed Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Rodriguez, et al v. OH Bur. Crim. Investigation, et al
as 13-3975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
OHIO BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, WOOD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOHN DOES, (1-3) and others
Rodriguez et al v. Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation et al
as 2:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Rodriguez and Scott Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation, Wood County Sheriff's Office, John Does (1-3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 1:2012cv00846
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Ohio Attorney General , Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and Hamilton County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
