Cases 21 - 30 of 302
Denious et al v. City of Newton Falls Police Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv02124
Plaintiff:
Noah B. Denious and Leaon D. Hines Vanterpool Gordon
Defendant:
City of Newton Falls Police Dept., Vincent A. Lombardo, Ohio State Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. FBI CJIS Division et al
as 2:2022cv11817
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
FBI CJIS Division, Cash America Pawn #3179, NICS Transaction Number (NTN): 1C2H2K97L and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Robert Johnson v. Drew Nelson, et al
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DREW NELSON, Ohio Highway Patrol, RICHLAND COUNTY JAIL, JUDGE JERRY E. AULT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenneth Jones v. USA, et al
as 21-5302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth W. Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States District Court, United States Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
