Cases 31 - 40 of 560
Burnett v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00993
Petitioner:
Johnny William Burnett
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loveless v. Peek et al
as 5:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Defendant:
Jim Peek, Jason M Hicks and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v. Farris
as 22-5093
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN COLE
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM FARRIS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Blanchard v. Oklahoma State
as 5:2022cv00902
Petitioner:
James Robert Blanchard
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rigsby v. Corder, et al
as 22-7050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. CORDER, CPL. HAYES, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Richards v. Whitten
as 5:2022cv00880
Petitioner:
Jerry L Richards
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanchard v. Oklahoma State
as 4:2022cv00424
Petitioner:
James Robert Blanchard
Respondent:
Oklahoma State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laffoon v. Bridges et al
as 5:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
William Franklin Laffoon
Defendant:
Carrie Bridges, Kevin Stitt and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammon v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00410
Petitioner:
Glen Dale Hammon
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Andrew Jorden Young
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
