Cases 1 - 10 of 732
Phillips v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00939
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Petitioner:
Jullian R Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DG v. Oklahoma State Board of Education
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
DG
Defendant:
Oklahoma State Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00873
Petitioner:
Homer Jones
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Loveless v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00858
Petitioner:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Respondent:
Jeff Sifers, Bill Dydee and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oklahoma State of v. Bryant
as 5:2024cv00796
Defendant:
William Bryant
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Price v. The Oklahoma State Department of Education et al
as 5:2024cv00769
Defendant:
Ryan Walters and The Oklahoma State Department of Education
Plaintiff:
Joseph Loren Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Parker v. Hartman et al
as 5:2024cv00743
Defendant:
Perry Hudson, Jermaine McCullum, Tiara McMinn and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricks v. Hughey et al
as 5:2024cv00739
Defendant:
Justin Dale Stone, Lory Dewey, Michelle Garrison and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha Siong Ricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roper v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00727
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Plaintiff:
Antonio Garcia Roper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cross v. Jacabsma et al
as 5:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Dan Jacabsma and Oklahoma State of
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
