Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Baisden v. Correctional Officer assigned to 'B' Dorm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Correctional Officer assigned to 'B' Dorm
Plaintiff:
Larry Roger Baisden, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinnie v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Fred Deangelo Quinnie
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Santangelo Vincent
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conrad v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Conrad
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrier v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rodney Farrier
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marco Jackson
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Brett C. Love
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Quandarian Faulkner
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells-Faith et al v. Robertson et al
as 1:2016cv00475
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Wells
Defendant:
Katie Robertson, Alabama Department of Correction, Mobile Community Base Work Release and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2016cv00264
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc(JOINT ASSIGN), Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Vention Medical Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Williams and Shannon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
