Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leanne Hensley v. Oregon Department of Justice
as 21-35976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANNE J. HENSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 21-35915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Leanne Hensley v. Oregon Department of Justice
as 21-35769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANNE J. HENSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Stade v. Oregon Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Stade
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Human Services, Oregon Department of Justice, Multnomah County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maricela Ramirez v. Joshua Kornegay, et al
as 21-35645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARICELA RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA KORNEGAY, M.D., SARAH GOMEZ, M.D., ADDRIENNE HUGHES, M.D. and others
Hsieh v. Oregon Judicial Department District 4 Multnomah County et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Marlene Manling Hsieh
Defendant:
Oregon Judicial Department District 4 Multnomah County, Multnomah County District Attorney's Office, Amy Baggio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leanne Hensley v. Oregon Department of Justice
as 20-36100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANNE J. HENSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Moret v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01757
Defendant:
Ernest Lannet, State of Oregon, Oregon Public Defense Services Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
