Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fields v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv01117
Defendant:
Hardeman Count Correctional Facility, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center, Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Orlando Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ultimate Cakra Liberation et al v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 1:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Ultimate Cakra Liberation, Charles Orlando Fields, Robert Birdwell and others
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Centurion et al
as 2:2015cv00110
Defendant:
Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton v. Schofield et al
as 3:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton, Charles Montague, Derrick Payne and others
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montague et al v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Charles Montague, Derrick Payne, Christopher Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Schofield et al
as 1:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Orlando Fields
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jerry Lester, Tim Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Hodge et al
as 3:2011cv00561
Plaintiff:
Orlando Fields
Defendant:
Reuben Hodge, Ronald G Turner, Donna K White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. TDOC et al
as 1:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Orlando Fields
Defendant:
TDOC, CCA, Reuben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Parker
as 1:2005cv01353
Petitioner:
Charles Orlando Fields
Respondent:
Tony Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
