Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas et al v. Orozco-Pineda et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Randolph Thomas and Bridgette Palmatierre
Defendant:
Jorge Orozco-Pineda, Henry Lopez-Calleja, Food Haulers Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
OROZCO v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04714
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC, DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYONA OROZCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00490
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OROZCO v. HEI HOTELS, LLC
as 5:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
NOEMI OROZCO
Defendant:
HEI HOTELS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spells et al v. Fenstermaker et al
as 3:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
Fuquan Spells, Freddie Sinkler, Terrence Ford and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OROZCO-CARRAZCO v. LONGLEY
as 1:2011cv00041
Petitioner:
JESUS OROZCO-CARRAZCO
Respondent:
ARCHIE B. LONGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OROZCO et al v. M. H. DETRICK COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv61452
Plaintiff:
DAVID FRANK OROZCO and CAROLINA OROZCO
Defendant:
M. H. DETRICK COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taveras v. Schuylkill County Pottsville et al
as 3:2010cv02383
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cesar Taveras
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Pottsville, Bureau of Police and Luzerne County Hazleton Police Department, Schuylkill County and Luzerne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JIMENEZ et al v. ROSENBAUM-CUNNINGHAM, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01066
Plaintiff:
BEATRIZ JIMENEZ, BEATRIZ JIMENEZ, BEATRIZ JIMENEZ and others
Defendant:
ROSENBAUM-CUNNINGHAM, INC., RICHARD S. ROSENBAUM, EDWARD SCOTT CUNNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
