Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Oshiro v. Tate Andale, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00308
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Oshiro and Joann Roth
Defendant:
Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc. , Cummins, Inc. , Flowserve US Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Cummins, Inc. and Ingersoll Rand Co.
Cross_defendant:
Ametek, Inc., CBS Corporation, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trumbull et al v. Chico Volkswagen et al
as CAN/3:16-cv-02360
Plaintiff:
Justin Trumbull , Ted Lichti , Jeffrey Koutz and others
Defendant:
Chico Volkswagen , Hanless Napa Volkswagen , Roseville Volkswagen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trumbull et al v. Chico Volkswagen et al
as 3:2016cv02360
Plaintiff:
Justin Trumbull , Ted Lichti , Jeffrey Koutz and others
Defendant:
Chico Volkswagen, Hanless Napa Volkswagen, Roseville Volkswagen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oshiro v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00157
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Young Cha Oshiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
United States v. Oshiro
as 1:2014cv00553
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William H. Oshiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Mascaro v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 1:2014cv00045
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Mascaro
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Thomas S. Monson, Rodney M. Oshiro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deferrell v. Chin et al
as 0:2014cv60041
Plaintiff:
Barrington Deferrell
Defendant:
Chin, Flores, Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
