Cases 1 - 10 of 565
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00665
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schechtman et al v. Marriott Hotel Services, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60150
Defendant:
Marriott Hotel Services, LLC formerly known as Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. doing business as Fort Lauderdale Marriott Harbor Beach Resort & Spa, Marriott Hotel Services, Inc., Harbor Beach Property, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Schechtman and Leonard Schechtman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Grullon v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
Victor Grullon
Respondent:
Otis Wilson and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallmon v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hallman and Derrick Hallmon
Defendant:
Warden Otis Smith, Captain Jones and Sabrina Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Dionna Young
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company, ABC Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
