Cases 1 - 10 of 17
DiGregorio v. Otis et al
as 1:2024cv10422
Plaintiff:
Nicholas DiGregorio
Defendant:
Robert Otis, Wilson Alves, Brockton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
TIG Insurance Company v. Otis Associates d/b/a Otis Ridge Ski Area et al
as 3:2023cv10539
Plaintiff:
TIG Insurance Company
Defendant:
Otis Associates doing business as Otis Ridge Ski Area, Jaime Carr, Alden C. Hewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Velez et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2018cv12517
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Otis Elevator Service Company
Plaintiff:
Martin Velez and Kim Velez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10945
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aftandilian v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv10590
Plaintiff:
Stella Aftandilian
Defendant:
United States of America, Emcor Government Services, Inc., Otis Elevator Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Otis v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2016cv12133
Plaintiff:
Amy Otis
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv12041
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Callahan v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12039
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Callahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mukarker v. City of Philadelphia et al
as 1:2016cv10355
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mukarker
Defendant:
City of Philadelphia , Philadelphia International Airport and Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
