Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Minor v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2019cv00155
Plaintiff:
Otis Minor
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Officer Bryan Sullivant, Attorney General Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCray v. Nelson
as 5:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Otis O. McCray
Defendant:
Davasha Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCray v. Olive
as 5:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Otis Oliver McCray
Defendant:
Kelly Suzanne Olive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dear v. Panola County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Walter Dear
Defendant:
Panola County, Mississippi, Otis Griffin and Bobby Meek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. City of Richton, Mississippi et al
as 2:2010cv00213
Plaintiff:
Otis Reed
Defendant:
City of Richton, Mississippi, Jimmy White, Richton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh et al v. Barbour et al
as 4:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Pierce McIntosh , Betty Davis , Roy Stanford and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, James Hood and The Mississippi Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashford et al v. City of Moss Point et al
as 1:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
Otis Ashford and Dell Jones
Defendant:
City of Moss Point, Johnny Vaughn, Brandon Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Allen et al v. Schafer, et al
as 4:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
James Allen, James Allen, James Allen and others
Defendant:
Ed Schafer and The United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
