Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Montgomery v. Otis Worldwide Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
TANYA M. MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION and KEVIN B. LORUSSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cordero v. The Table at Redeye Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cordero
Defendant:
The Table at Redeye Inc., Peter Cecere, Otis Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv09412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nicholas v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07716
Plaintiff:
Otis J. Nicholas, Sr.
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Utley v. Miller
as 1:2023cv06022
Petitioner:
Otis Utley
Respondent:
Warden Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Otis Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Drummond v. CVS Pharmacy
as 1:2023cv05741
Plaintiff:
Stanley Otis Drummond
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Drummond v. CVS Pharmacy
as 1:2023cv05992
Plaintiff:
Stanley Otis Drummond
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lyndon Hazell v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2023cv02908
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Hazell
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Bruce v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Otis Bruce
Defendant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and ITW Building Components Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
