Antitrust Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
SCHUYLKILL HEALTH SYSTEM v. CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv07065
Plaintiff: SCHUYLKILL HEALTH SYSTEM
Defendant: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and OWENS & MINOR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Burhans Glass Company, Incorporated v. Guardian Industries Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv01736
Plaintiff: BURHANS GLASS COMPANY, INCORPORATED and BURHANS GLASS COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant: GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, PPG INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, PILKINGTON GROUP LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
D R Ward Constr Co v. Mitsubishi Rayon America, Inc.
as 08-3358
Plaintiff - Appellee: D R WARD CONSTR CO, ANNA C. FURNEY and DAVID PEARMAN
Defendant - Appellee: MITSUBISHI RAYON AMERICA, INC.
Defendant: ROHM & HAAS CO, ATOFINA CHEM INC, CROMPTON CORP and others
Not Party - Appellant: OWEN F. SILVIOUS
In Re: Plastics Additives, et al, et al
as 08-1419
Plaintiff: DR WARD CONSTR CO, ANNA C. FURNEY and DAVID PEARMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant: ROHM & HAAS CO, ATOFINA CHEM INC, FKA Elf Atochem, CROMPTON CORP and others
Not Party - Appellant: OWEN F. SILVIOUS
DRAPER v. GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv05223
Plaintiff: JOHN DRAPER and JOHN DRAPER
Defendant: GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP., GUARDIAN FABRICATION INC., LAKE GUARDIAN WALLED FABRICATION CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
OWENS v. PFIZER, INC., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2002cv01390
Plaintiff: WILLIAM OWENS , DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS, DIRECT PURCHASER NON-CLASS, AND END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS , CVS PHARMACY, INC. and others
Defendant: PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY
Pecial_master: PAUL R. RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?