Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Poole et al v. Bendixen et al
as 6:2020cv00697
Defendant:
Thomas Oelrichs, Jeff Raney, Randy Mooney and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 7, Charles C. Manner, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Edmondson et al v. Raniere et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Lauren Salzman, Dr. Danielle Roberts, Kathy Russell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Toni Natalie, Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Chakravorty Suneel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kupfer, et al v. Residential Mortgage Solution LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv02738
Plaintiff:
Betty Ann Kupfer, Charles Kupfer and Betty Kupfer
Defendant:
Colonial Fund 17 LLC, Natalie Owens, Residential Mortgage Solution LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of New York v. Chavez
as 13-2931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of New York
Defendant:
Pam Chavez, Chavez, Inc., Pam Chavez, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Pedro A. Bello
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Margulis, Ph.D et al
as 1:2012cv03562
Defendant:
American Psychological Care, P.C., Comprehensive Psychological Evaluation, P.C., Andriy Kostynyuk and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Company,, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of New York v. Chavez et al
as 1:2011cv02691
Plaintiff:
The City of New York
Defendant:
Israel Chavez, Pam Chavez, Chavez, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chapman, Spira & Carson, LLC et al v. Hydrogen Hybrid Fuel Cell Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv07258
Plaintiff:
Chapman, Spira & Carson, LLC, Raymond L. Dirks, Kazi Hasan and others
Defendant:
Hydrogen Hybrid Fuel Cell Corp., Hydrogen Hybrid Corp., Kenneth Owen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
