Cases 11 - 20 of 312
Owens v. USA
as 5:2023cv01410
Petitioner:
Frederick T. Owens
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Lenard Owens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Owens v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01853
Plaintiff:
James Owens
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Owens v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antoine Owens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hmoud, et al v. City Of Cincinnati, et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
ahmad hmoud and Liberty Used Tires, LLC
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Emily Smart Woerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00096
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Owens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Owen v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Paul Owen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Giles et al v. Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
David Giles, Morgan Brey, Matt Dotson and others
Defendant:
Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC and MARK MINTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Avery v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04278
Plaintiff:
James Owen Avery
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Owens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Owens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
