Cases 1 - 10 of 169
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LLEWLYN v. KODGER
as 1:2022cv03810
Petitioner:
CHARLES LLEWLYN and OWEN ODMAN
Respondent:
DR. K. KODGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOGAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. LOGAN, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR, DAVID S. OWENS and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOMASSINI v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
RUBEN TOMASSINI
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID OWENS and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. OWENS et al
as 1:2021cv20714
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANTHONY GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv13805
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID S. OWEN, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLLARD v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv12945
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DIRECTOR OWENS, FREEHOLDER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIR POLLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. MCBRIDE et al
as 1:2020cv17578
Defendant:
DOUGLAS GRUNDLOCK, JILL MAYERS, REGINALD ADKINS and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD LEE DAVIS and REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLACK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv06984
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MICHELLE OWENS and KEITH M. CLACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
