Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Neahkahnie Water District v. Seventeen Enterprises et al
as 3:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Seventeen Enterprises, Pacifica Land Conservation, LLC and Owens Financial Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neahkahnie Water District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
In re: UPS "Air-In-Ground" Mktg & SPL
as 11-56478
:
In re: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE "AIR-IN-GROUND" MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POCINO FOODS COMPANY, ARAPAHOE HYUNDAI, LLC, OWENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SREVICE, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO., a Delaware corporation, DBA United Parcel Service Co. (Air) and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE GENERAL SERVICES CO., a Delaware corporation
DESERT LAND, et al. v. OWENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., et al.
as 2:2000cv01406
Plaintiff:
Howard Bulloch, Casa Malaga Motel, Inc and Desert Land, LLC
Defendant:
Del Mar Mortage, Inc, Owens Financial Group, Inc, Michael Shustek and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Owens Financial Group, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04352
Plaintiff:
Owens Financial Group, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service General Services Co., United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
In Re United Parcel Service "Air-In-Ground" Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2010ml02153
Plaintiff:
Arapahoe Hyundai LLC, Designer Imports International Inc, J-Rag Inc and others
Defendant:
Does, United Parcel Service Co, United Parcel Service General Services Co. and others
In Re:
United Parcel Service "Air-In-Ground" Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Owens Financial Group, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Owens Financial Group, Inc., Owens Financial Group, Inc., Owens Financial Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service General Services Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
