Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae: The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner: Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2908
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police and Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2403
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile
Petitioner: Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2379
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, Joseph Cecile and others
Defendant / Appellant: Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, in his Official Capcity as Superintendent of the New York State Police, Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County and others
Petitioner: Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk et al v. Hochul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, Judge Doran J. Matthew and others
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Attorney P. David Soares et al
as 1:2021cv00664
Plaintiff: James Carter
Defendant: Attorney P. David Soares, Any Judiciary Member(s) of Albany County NY, Attorney David Brickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levine v. New York State Police et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00503
Defendant: County of Albany, Albany County District Attorney's Office, Major Robert Patenaude and others
Plaintiff: Richie Foster Levine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malloy v. Sopchak et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01460
Defendant: Matthew Seeber, John/Jane Doe # 3, Albany County/City and others
Plaintiff: Javar Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Heid et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv01213
Plaintiff: Gavin C. Thomas
Defendant: Larry Heid, Christopher Cornell, P. David Soares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Soars et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00371
Plaintiff: Quron Morris
Respondent: P David Soars, Albany County Police Department, Police Detective - John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?