Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Earl Johnson, Jr. v. John Steele
as 20-6683
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER JOHN SWEENEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER II JOHN STEELE, SERGEANT TRAVIS CALDER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL P. JOHNSON, JR.
Ronald Tharrington, Jr. v. Dale Moreno
as 19-7039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD A. THARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
L. JONES, L.P.N., H. C. RAY, Regional Administrator of Health Services, DAVIS, Former Assistant Warden of Buckingham Correctional Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. DALE MORENO
Johnson et al v. Catapano, et al
as 4:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Danny S. Johnson , Sharon S. Johnson and Ryan P. Johnson
Defendant:
Salvatore Catapano and Blue Water Marine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
US v. Michael Johnson
as 16-4005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL P. JOHNSON
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. , Teva Neuroscience, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Mylan Inc. and Natco Pharma Ltd.
Movant:
Kenneth P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
US v. Darrell P. Johnson
as 10-7307
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRELL P. JOHNSON
Beverly Byrd v. Gregory Johnson
as 09-1533
Debtor:
In re: BEVERLY BYRD and RALPH T. BYRD
Debtor - Appellant:
BEVERLY BYRD and RALPH T. BYRD
Trustee - Appellee:
GREGORY P. JOHNSON
Thomas Johnson, III v. Margaret Spellings
as 08-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS P. JOHNSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET SPELLINGS, Secretary of the United States Department of Education
Johnson v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, Margaret Spellings
as 8:2007cv00671
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Johnson, III
Defendant:
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, Margaret Spellings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
