Cases 41 - 50 of 67
DUNSON v. KAGON
as 5:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE L DUNSON
Defendant:
GALIRAK KAGON, ROBIN BRANCH, GREG PAYTHREES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Dunson v. Galinak Kagon, et al
as 12-11192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE L. DUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GALINAK KAGON, Medical Doctor, LYSETTE LAGNES, Chief Health Officer, ROBIN BRANCH, Head Nurse and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Billy Hammock v. Ann Vickery, et al
as 12-10166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY N. HAMMOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
ANN M VICKERY, JOYCE GRIENER, Disability Rep, P. WILLIAMS and others
Hammock v. Vickery et al
as 4:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
Ann M. Vickery, Joyce Griener, P Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNSON v. KAGON, et al
as 5:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE L DUNSON
Defendant:
GALINAK KAGON, LYSETTE LAGNES, ROBIN BRANCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albers v. Williams et al
as 6:2011cv01460
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Albers
Defendant:
P. Williams and Darlene Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Lepeska, Jr. v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 11-13965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD KENNETH LEPESKA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, K. MINTON, Jane Doe #1, an individual and official capacities, S. MOIZUDDIN, Jane Doe #2, an individual and official capacities and others
Lepeska Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv01105
Plaintiff:
Richard Kenneth Lepeska Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, K. Minton, S. Moizuddin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MCNEIL
as 3:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARKIECE JACKSON
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, TIMOTHY CANNON, R TIFFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
