Cases 1 - 10 of 415
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
John Miguel Swan
Respondent:
Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Sanchez v. Jacob et al
as 6:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Felipa D. Sanchez
Defendant:
Ryan P. Jacob, Williams Sausage Co. Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Petitioner:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hicks v. Whitten
as 5:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Charles P Hicks
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintana v. Clinton W. Marrs, LTD et al
as 6:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Dr. Elias Quintana
Defendant:
Clinton W. Marrs, LTD, Ralph Fevig, Stephen P. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Halliburton et al v. Eades et al
as 5:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Halliburton and Leah Mari Halliburton
Defendant:
Bryan M Eades, Conner P Newman and Connor P Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyrone Morrison
Defendant:
Joel P Ward, Joel Burks, Robert Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
