Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05761
Plaintiff:
Billy P. Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Martinizing International LLC
as 2:2021cv03054
Defendant:
Martinizing International LLC
Plaintiff:
J & A Smith Enterprises Inc. dba Martinizing Dry Cleaning and Justin P Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00992
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rohrs, et al
as 3:2017cv00225
Defendant:
Rohrs, Dona Powell, United Telephone Company of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Commissioner:
David Rosenblum Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Cochran et al v. Premier Transportation & Warehousing, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
Erika A. Cochran and Mark A. Cochran
Defendant:
Premier Transportation & Warehousing, Inc. and Bruce P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv02387
Plaintiff:
Linda M Smith and Larry P Smith
Defendant:
Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation , Mercantile Insurance and Fidelity Company, Developers Surety and Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2014cv02018
Petitioner:
Michael P Smith
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hardaway v. City of Toledo et al
as 3:2014cv01418
Plaintiff:
Beverly Hardaway
Defendant:
City of Toledo , City of Toledo Police Department and Michael P Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Smith
as 1:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
Tim Frazier
Defendant:
Russell P Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
