Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 121
Christina Paylan v. Bondi, et al
as 17-11756
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTINA PAYLAN, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee: PAM BONDI, individual capacity, MARK OBER, individual capacity, DARRELL DIRKS, individual capacity and others
: SERVICE
Mendoza v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00332
Petitioner: Nabor Mendoza
Respondent: Julie Jones and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAND et al v. SCOTT et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00128
Plaintiff: JAMES MICHAEL HAND , JOSEPH JAMES GALASSO , HAROLD W GIRCSIS, JR and others
Defendant: RICK SCOTT , PAM BONDI , JEFF ATWATER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Civil Rights Voting
v. Sacks et al
as 3:2017cv00295
Plaintiff: Jestin Max Sacks
Defendant: Douglas Andrew Dorsey, Rick Scott and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watts v. Bondi et al
as 1:2017cv20722
Plaintiff: Milton Watts
Defendant: Pam Bondi, Rick Scott, Thomas M. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watts v. Bondi et al
as 8:2017cv00410
Plaintiff: Milton Watts
Defendant: Pam Bondi, Rick Scott, Thomas M. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2017cv60204
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: State of Florida, Tim Shepherd, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Bondi et al
as 8:2017cv00177
Plaintiff: Milton Watts
Defendant: Pam Bondi, Scott Graber, Suzanne Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walde v. State of Florida et al
as 5:2016cv00717
Plaintiff: Paul Donovan Walde
Defendant: State of Florida, Rick Scott and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mollott, et al v. Scott, et al
as 9:2016cv82005
Plaintiff: Arnold A Mollott and Murray Naditch
Defendant: Rick Scott, Pam Bondi and Ken Detzner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?