Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Burnham v. Colorado Parole Board
as 1:2024cv11056
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Colorado Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latham v. Hurley et al
as 1:2024cv10130
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Tina Hurley, Charlene Bonner, Tonomey Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donovan v. Massachusetts Parole Board
as 1:2022cv11459
Petitioner:
Joseph Donovan
Respondent:
Massachusetts Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 1:2021cv10080
Petitioner:
Eric Derell Barnes
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Bureau Of Prisions et al
as 4:2020cv40059
Respondent:
Devens Warden, Federal Medical Center, Bureau Of Prisions and others
Petitioner:
Albert L. Johnson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barnes v The United States Parole Commission
as 1:2019cv12052
Respondent:
The United States Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Eric Derell Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCarthy v. Koutoujian et al
as 1:2019cv11533
Defendant:
Peter Koutoujian, Superintendent o Osvaldo Vidal, Massachusetts State Parole and others
Plaintiff:
William D. McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doucette v. Treseler et al
as 1:2018cv11817
Defendant:
Tina Hurley, Lucy M. Soto, Sheila Dupre and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Doucette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10849
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jean Louis v. Federal Bureau of Prisions Medical Center Devens et al
as 1:2018cv10586
Petitioner:
Joe W. Jean Louis
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisions Medical Center Devens, Warden for Devens Federal Medical Center and United States of Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
