Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Ouellette v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board et al
as 2:2024cv10750
Plaintiff:
Scott Mitchell Ouellette
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board and Warden
Martin v. Whitmer et al
as 5:2024cv10551
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington, John Christiansen and others
Hartwell v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Office et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Willie Lamar Hartwell
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Office and Ingham County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBardelaben v. Michigan Parole Board
as 2:2023cv12506
Plaintiff:
Willie D. DeBardelaben, III
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board
Yant #237696 v. Michigan Parole Board
as 1:2023cv00978
Petitioner:
James N. Yant #237696
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Killian v. King et al
as 2:2023cv11577
Plaintiff:
Travor Austin Killian and Trevor Austin Killian
Defendant:
Mat King, St. Clair County Sheriff's Department, Port Huron Police Department and others
Gooding v. Parole Board et al
as 2:2023cv10949
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Gooding
Respondent:
Parole Board and Heidi Washington
Mullholland #484881 v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Paul Mullholland #484881
Defendant:
Nate Hoffman, Unknown Miller, Unknown Horrocks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill #311151 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hill #311151
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections and Michigan Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromer #211902 v. Eagan et al
as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Defendant:
Michael Eagan, MDOC Parole Board, Brian J. Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
