Cases 1 - 10 of 30
James Rains v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 23-1210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RAHEEM RAINS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, UNKNOWN #1, Deputy Director named as John/Jane Doe on complaint, UNKNOWN #2, Food Service Contract Manager named as John/Jane Doe on complaint and others
Dykes #201541 v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes #201541
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Timothy Stallman, Wendy Jamros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuff #204491 v. Willard et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Richard Hannable McDuff #204491
Defendant:
Patricia Willard, Ecoe M. Hill, Jennifer Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Temujin Kensu v. MDOC, et al
as 21-1802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEMUJIN KENSU
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, DAN HEYNS and others
Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 21-1083
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKEY J. COLEMAN, GINA COUTURIER, HOWARD TYREE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEMUJIN KENSU
Temujin KensuIn re: Temujin Kensu
as 20-105
Respondent:
PATRICIA CARUSO, DOES 1-200, (MDOC Food Service Managers), DAN HEYNS and others
Petitioner:
In re: TEMUJIN KENSU
Rains #850456 v. Washington et al
as 2:2020cv00032
Defendant:
M. Hakola, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #3, M. Callentine and others
Plaintiff:
James Raheem Rains #850456
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Boles, Jr. v. Joan Rogers, et al
as 19-1310
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN ROGERS, JOAN E. ROGERS, CHARLES BERNARD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BOLES, JR.
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10616
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10615
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
