Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Windom v. Brady et al
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Alan C. Nelson, Dick Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
I & O Publishing Co., Neo-Tech Research Writing Center and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bussie v. Evans et al
as 3:2013cv01623
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Marie A. Evans, Elizabeth Pascal, FJ F-Vina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMasters-Stone et al v. Biden
as 2:2012cv02711
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. McMasters-Stone
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Daniel Akaka, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perales v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U S Marshals Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Azael Dythian Perales v. Orange County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2011cv00824
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Patricia C Bates, Ben S Bernanke and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales v. United States of America et al
as 8:2011cv00201
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Ben Bernanke, Joseph Biden and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales et al v. Dollar Tree Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01772
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Alice M Batchelder, Ben S Bernanke and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Steve Edwards and Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales v. United States of America et al
as 8:2010cv01472
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Ben S Bernanke, Joseph R Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv02388
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Azael Dythian Perales v. United States of America et al
as 8:2010cv01250
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Ben S Bernanke, Joseph R Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
