Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Weddington v. Patuxent Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01913
Defendant:
Dietary Sgt. S. Johnson and Patuxent Institution
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Weddington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Weddington v. Patuxent Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Weddington
Defendant:
Sgt. Dawn Hasley and Patuxent Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Patuxent Institution
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Damien Daniel
Defendant:
Patuxent Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Bickford v. Director of Patuxent Institution
as 23-7159
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PAUL BICKFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02797
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKnight v. Malone et al
as 1:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Gregory McKnight
Defendant:
Isaiah Malone and Patuxent Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pronin v. Dr. Moore et al
as 1:2022cv01864
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin and Leyleen Lillith Aquino
Defendant:
Dr. Moore, Dr. Venk, O Johnson A.W. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Warden of Patuxent Institution
as 1:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Michael Hardy
Respondent:
Warden of Patuxent Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hicks v. Warden at Patuxent Institution
as 1:2021cv03103
Plaintiff:
Paul Hicks
Defendant:
Warden at Patuxent Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Patuxent Institution
as 1:2020cv03373
Defendant:
Patuxent Institution
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
