Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robert Devore v. Thomas Balmer, et al
as 13-36039
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN DEVORE
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS A. BALMER, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the State of Oregon, NOEL MILLER, Head, Presidential Task Force to Infiltrate Organized Crime and the Drug Market on the West Coast, JOHN DOE, Superintendent, Oregon State Police and others
DeVore v. Balmer et al
as 3:2013cv00915
Defendant:
Ann Aiken, Victor G. Atiyeh, Thomas A. Balmer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen DeVore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-35579
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00373
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Cheeseman v. Randolph Garrison, et al
as 10-36124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CHEESEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDOLPH L. GARRISON, JOAN G. SEITZ, JAMES W. NASS and others
Cheeseman v. Garrison et al
as 6:2010cv06368
Plaintiff:
Robert Cheeseman
Defendant:
Paul J. DeMuniz, Randolph L. Garrison, Jack L. Landau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 6:2007cv06315
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Robert A. Fiatal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albrecht v. DeMuniz et al
as 3:2007cv01212
Plaintiff:
Nikolaus Albrecht
Defendant:
Paul J. DeMuniz, Thomas A. Balmer, W. Michael Gillette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
