Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HAYDEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05970
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH HAYDEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASSANO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12893
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH CASSANO and THE ESTATE OF LILLIAN CASSANO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRUENENFELDER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2020cv03566
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH GRUENENFELDER
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
SAYRE v. SHOPRITE et al
as 1:2018cv05559
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH SAYRE
Defendant:
SHOPRITE , WAKEFERN FOOD CORP. and RIO GRANDE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMURA v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2016cv08686
Petitioner:
PAUL JOSEPH SCHMURA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06482
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
BURNETTE v. NIEVES et al
as 3:2014cv03642
Plaintiff:
PAUL-JOSEPH: BURNETTE
Defendant:
DENNIS NIEVES, COLIN T. VANDEMARK, JOSEPH REA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
