Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lin et al v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv01857
Plaintiff:
Lin Lin and James Peeler
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abdel-Malak et al v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv01698
Plaintiff:
Gamal S. Abdel-Malak, Mona N. Abdel-Malak, Nardina G. Abdel-Malak and others
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Michael Mukasey, US Citizenship & Immigration Svc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Liu-Helisch v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv01629
Plaintiff:
Yan Jiao Liu-Helisch
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Peter Keisler, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kilic et al v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv01203
Plaintiff:
Osman Kilic and Zuhal Kilic
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ribeiro v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv01162
Plaintiff:
Ana Lucia Ribeiro
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
