Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA et al v. PAXTON
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA and Eric Hananoki
Defendant:
WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ISOM v. PAXTON et al
as 1:2022cv03558
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
KEN PAXTON, SCOTT LEKAM, AVRIL HAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILLIAMS et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
JOHN B. WILLIAMS, III and BERNARD ENTERISES AND ENTERTAINMENT, B.E.E. LLC
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, HENRY CUELLAR, JOHN CORNYN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUSENBERRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.
as 1:2019cv02716
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS and NELSON EDWARD DUSENBERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT THOMAS CHRISTIAN, MATT MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, JENNIFER THARP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS et al v. BNP PARIBAS S.A. et al
as 1:2015cv01945
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS , GARY ROBERT OWENS , ESTATE OF BETTY OWENS EVELY and others
Defendant:
BNP PARIBAS, S.A. , BNP PARIBAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and BNP PARIBAS (SUISSE) S.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
PAXTON v. MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
NICOLE PAXTON
Defendant:
MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER and STEVEN W. BOYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
