Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Paxton Lane Multifamily LP v. Dunn
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Paxton Lane Multifamily LP doing business as The Paxton
Defendant:
Valerie Dunn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Kareem of the Family Hodge v. Paxton et al
as 1:2017cv04509
Plaintiff:
Kareem of the Family Hodge
Defendant:
Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Cathy P. Clark, Nueces County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingler v. Milestone Mangagement et al
as 1:2017cv03992
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
Milestone Mangagement, Kelly Jackson, Rivervista LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Slaven v. Silva et al
as 1:2017cv01128
Plaintiff:
Prince E. Slaven, Jr.
Defendant:
Zenaida Silva , Christina Cheryl Johnson and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Steve Astrin Properties LLC v. James et al
as 1:2015cv02195
Plaintiff:
Steve Astrin Properties LLC
Defendant:
Kera James and Christopher Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ball v. Forsyth County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
John C. Ball
Defendant:
Forsyth County Board of Commissioners, Forsyth County, Ted Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Forsyth County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2014cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ricky J. Johnson
Defendant:
Forsyth County Board of Commissioners, Tom Wilson, Ted Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
