Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ayala v. NYC Human Resources Administration et al
as 1:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ayala
Defendant:
NYC Human Resources Administration, Jamie Esparza, El Paso District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Owens et al v. Taliban
as 1:2022cv01949
Defendant:
Taliban and Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
Plaintiff:
James Owens, Estate of Betty Owens Evely, Gary Robert Owens and others
Not Classified By Court:
Christine O'Neil
Interested Party:
Anne Wodenshek, Sarah Wodenshek, Haley Wodenshek and others
Garnishee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party:
Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court:
Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff:
Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant:
Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae:
The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader:
MNZ Inc
Respondent:
Visa Inc.
Intervenor:
Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant:
St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re:
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Trustees of the District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds et al v. Paxton Painting Corp.
as 7:2018cv05555
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds and D.C.9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades
Defendant:
Paxton Painting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Paxton v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2018cv04904
Plaintiff:
Laura Paxton
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 701
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Paxton Painting Corp.
as 1:2016cv08555
Plaintiff:
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Defendant:
Paxton Painting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
