Cases
Ramon DAndrea Dent v. 2100 W 96th St, Los Angeles, CA Parcel 6057007056 et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner: Ramon DAndrea Dent
Respondent: 2100 W 96th St, Los Angeles, CA Parcel 6057007056, California TD Specialists, CDEF Investment LLC with Wanyao Xuan, Guojun Xuan and others
Defendant: PC Funding Incorporated doing business as PC Funding Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramon Dent v. California TD Specialists et al
as 2:2023mc00134
Respondent: Peer Street Funding LLC, California TD Specialists, CDEF Investment LLC and others
Petitioner: Ramon Dent
Defendant: Dent Estate, United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv03375
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Interlachen Harriet Investment v. Douglas A. Kelley, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6013
Debtor: In re: Petters Company, Inc., Petters Group Worldwide, LLC, PC Funding, LLC and others
Objector - Appellant: Interlachen Harriet Investments Limited
Movant - Appellee: Douglas Arthur Kelley, as Chapter 11 Trustee for Petters Company, Inc., Petters Group Worldwide, LLC, and PAC Funding, LLC and as Court Appointed Receiver for Thomas Petters, Inc. and Petters Aircraft Leasing, LLC, John R. Stoebner, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Jointly Administered Bankruptcy Cases Captioned In re: Polaroid Corporation, et al., Case No. 08-46617, Petters Aviation, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv00680
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor-in-Posse: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?