Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Pearson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv03349
Plaintiff:
Rhiannon Pearson
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pearson Air Construction, LLC v. PCL Construction Services, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
Pearson Air Construction, LLC
Defendant:
PCL Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Donald v. Pearson et al
as 1:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
LaRon Antonio Donald
Defendant:
Doug Pearson, Mark Fairbairn, Linsday Gouty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ullerich v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2021cv02954
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Ullerich
Defendant:
Jefferson County, City of Aurora, City of Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. et al v. Solis
as 1:2021cv02131
Plaintiff:
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc and NCS Pearson, Inc doing business as Pearson VUE
Defendant:
Dailys Solis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Johnson v. Pearson
as 1:2021cv01938
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Defendant:
Doup Pearson and Doug Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harker v. Pearson
as 1:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Harker and Chris Harker
Defendant:
D. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longfrazier v. City of Aurora Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv03207
Defendant:
Carl Tolman, City of Denver Police Department, Shane (I) Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Shamarr Longfrazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
