Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ademiluyi v. Judge Sheila Tillerson Adams et al
as 8:2023cv03526
Plaintiff:
Judge April Ademiluyi
Defendant:
Judge Sheila Tillerson Adams, Judge Daneeka Varner Cotton and Judge Michael Ray Pearson
Intervenor:
George McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Royal v. Gill Bright et al
as 8:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Theresa D. Royal
Defendant:
Judge Robin D. Gill Bright, Attorney Edward S. Cohn, CSMB Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Allotey et al v. Baltimore County, Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv02288
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allotey and Caia Weaver
Defendant:
Baltimore County, Maryland, Officer S. Becketts, #5748, Officer Ruiz, #5929 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pearson v. Salmon et al
as 1:2014cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pearson
Defendant:
Brian M. Salmon and Jason Leventhal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. Braverman
as 1:2013cv03768
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pearson
Defendant:
Nathan Braverman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. Baltimore City Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv02214
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pearson
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police Department, Robert Labar, Baltimore Abandoned Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
