Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Coyne et al v. Parkside Credit Union et al
as 9:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Morgan Coyne and Kevin Pearson
Defendant:
Parkside Credit Union, Experian Corp., Equifax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Prochaska v. Contreraz et al
as 1:2020cv00101
Defendant:
John Pearson and Nathan Contreraz
Plaintiff:
Dalton Daniel Prochaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braulick v. Bullock et al
as 6:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Paul Rees, Eric Thomas, Steve Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John Braulick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braulick v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John Braulick
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Mike Batista, Connie Winner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. USA
as 1:2017cv00072
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carol Lynette Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Witherall v. Bell et al
as 4:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Allen Witherall
Defendant:
Darrell Bell, Uknown USMS Auditors One and Two, Unknown Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshals One and Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoen v. Bell et al
as 4:2017cv00039
Defendant:
Darrell Bell, Uknown USMS Auditors One and Two, Unknown Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshals One and Two and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schoen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quigg et al v. Bell et al
as 4:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Quigg
Defendant:
Darrell Bell, Uknown USMS Auditors One and Two, Unknown Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshals One and Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
D'Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Mike Batista, Berdecia Rodriguez, Dodins-Odegard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
