Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Young v. Pearson
as 3:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Curly Henry Young
Defendant:
Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Dougherty et al
as 3:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
William McKinney
Defendant:
Dougherty and Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept of Correction, Wilson, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin, Oles, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahim v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Rahim
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Mike Pearson, Ballaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petion v. Pearson et al
as 3:2022cv01647
Plaintiff:
Divenson Petion
Defendant:
Pearson, McNeil, Blevons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnel v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Marquis Kinnel
Defendant:
Brown, Gooley, Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan et al v. Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01440
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Sullivan, Robert McRina, Elbert Lewis and others
Defendant:
Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sherman v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frank Sherman, III
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
