Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Peavy v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Peavy
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peavy v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08587
Plaintiff:
Mackenzie Peavy
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peavy v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv00767
Plaintiff:
Herman Peavy
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Juul Labs, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2019md02913
Plaintiff:
Virginia Jose Angullo, Tracie Kugler, M.C. and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Holdfast Vapors LLC and others
Interested Party:
Danielle Mason and Matthew Blomquist
Petitioner:
Ethan Cooper, Alex Zike, Javon Clark and others
Special Master:
Thomas J. Perrelli and Honorable Gail A. Andler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swearingen et al v. Juul Labs Inc et al
as 3:2019cv04424
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group Inc. and Phillip Morris USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Via Peavy and Elizabeth Ann Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peavy v. Madden
as 3:2019cv00743
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Emanual James Peavy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peavy et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv01318
Plaintiff:
Herb Peavy and Vicki Peavy
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peavy v. Garza et al
as 3:2016cv00579
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Peavy
Defendant:
C.O. Garza and Lieutenant Dark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peavy v. The People
as 3:2015cv02940
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Peavy
Defendant:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Peavy v. Doe
as 3:2015cv02845
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Peavy
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
