Cases 11 - 18 of 18
LODGE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64045
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS LODGE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION , PENN CENTRAL RAILROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KLUPZAK v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62740
Plaintiff:
JOHANNA KLUPZAK
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STARNER v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv07613
Plaintiff:
RANDY STARNER
Defendant:
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SLASKI v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv02925
Plaintiff:
FELIX SLASKI
Defendant:
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DURBIN v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv01528
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. DURBIN, JR.
Defendant:
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Pierce v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company et al
as 1:2008cv12163
Plaintiff:
Donald A. Pierce
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Consolidated Rail Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DOZIER v. CONSOLIDATED RAILROAD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv63194
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA DOZIER
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAILROAD CORPORATION, PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, CAREY CANADA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DOZIER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv61328
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA DOZIER
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL COMPANY, PENNCENTRAL CORPORA, PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
