Cases 1 - 10 of 14
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY v. CORYELL et al
as 2:2015cv02534
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY
Defendant:
EDWARD CORYELL, SR., EDWARD CORYELL, JR., J. R. HOCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MUHAMMAD v. PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv05744
Plaintiff:
KHABIYRA MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Madeline Apollo
as 12-3033
Petitioner:
In re: MADELINE APOLLO
Respondent:
PA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY and AHMEENAH YOUNG, President & CEO, Pennsylvania Convention Center Authority
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
PETRESE B TUCKER
APOLLO v. PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv06684
Plaintiff:
MADELINE APOLLO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY and AHMEENAH YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY v. BRUNNER
as 2:2010cv04200
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY
Defendant:
GEORGE BRUNNER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
DiMUCCI et al v. THE PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2008cv04810
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DiMUCCI and DAVID QUEROLI
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY and AHMEENAH YOUNG
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
