Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hernandez v. Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez Hernandez
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez v. Bureau of Prisons (BOP) et al
as 3:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez Hernandez
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Marco Morado Perez
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez v. USA
as 3:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
Carlos Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez-Lopez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00021
Defendant:
A.C.C.C. Washington MS., GEO Group Inc. and Great Plains CI
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Lopez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00017
Defendant:
A.C.C.C. Washington MS., Geo Group Inc. and Great Plains CI
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Perez-Lopez v. Woods et al
as 5:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Ms. Gaveet, Mark Woods, Mr. Januery and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lopez Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Mayes et al
as 4:2018cv00200
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corr., Officer Martin Mayes and Ms. St. Pen.
Plaintiff:
Perez Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Elizalde-Perez v. Nash
as 3:2018cv00598
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
Warden Cheron Nash
Petitioner:
Edgar Elizalde-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Mayes et al
as 3:2018cv00451
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corr., Officer Martin Mayes and Ms. St. Pen.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Perez Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
