Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Donald ColeIn re: Donald Cole
as 23-2349
Petitioner: In re: DONALD COLE
Respondent: CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, PERRY PHELPS, Warden, FRANK PENNELL, Chaplain and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-3030
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Department of Corrections, DEPUTY WARDEN CHRISTOPHER KLIEN, Assistant Deputy to Commissioner, MICHAEL DELOY, Bureau of Prisons, Bureau Chief and others
Jerome Sullins v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 13-2188
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEROME SULLINS
Defendant - Appellee: PERRY PHELPS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Jerome Sullins v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 13-2187
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEROME SULLINS
Defendant - Appellee: PERRY PHELPS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Fred Caldwell v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 13-2062
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRED T. CALDWELL
Defendant - Appellee: PERRY PHELPS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Chad McCloskey v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 13-1781
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHAD J. MCCLOSKEY
Defendant - Appellee: PERRY PHELPS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Charles Monroe v. Christopher Klein, et al
as 12-4287
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee: NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff, MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer, BENSON, Staff and others
Royal Downs v. State of Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-7776
Petitioner - Appellant: ROYAL DIAMOND DOWNS
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF MARYLAND, PERRY PHELPS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3552
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Derrick Johnson
as 12-3209
Petitioner: In re: DERRICK L. JOHNSON
Respondent: PERRY PHELPS, Warden, Delaware Correctional Center and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?