Cases 31 - 40 of 1,817
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as ALN/2:24-CV-00024
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Corporation Amerex and others
Marek v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gary Marek
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Race v. Montana State Prison Infirmary, et al.
as 24-38
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL SIDNEY RACE
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA STATE PRISON INFIRMARY, PAUL REES, Dr. NEUMEISTER and others
Peterson v. Icosavax, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brent Peterson
Defendant:
Icosavax, Inc., Peter Kolchinsky, Heidi Kunz and others
Tim Peterson v. Learfield Communications, LLC, et al
as 23-3773
Plaintiff:
Tim Peterson, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
Learfield Communications, LLC and Sidearm Sports, LLC
Cross et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2023cv01143
Plaintiff:
Wyley Cross, Tyler Kemp, Cori Peterson and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and Administrator Angela Gladwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Carper
as 23-1378
Petitioner:
In re: JULIE CARPER
Respondent:
DOUGLAS PETERSON, SHAWN EATHERTON and SHARON K. MAULER
Peterson v. Unknown Agents of ATF and FBI, et al.
as 2:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Peterson
Defendant:
Unknown Agents of ATF and FBI, Darrell Michael Gunderson, Holly Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M&D Peterson, LLC v. SIKA AG et al
as PAE/2:23-CV-04711
Plaintiff:
M&D Peterson, LLC
Defendant:
SIKA AG, SIKA CORPORATION, CHRYSO, INC and others
M&D Peterson, LLC v. SIKA AG et al
as 2:2023cv04711
Plaintiff:
M&D PETERSON, LLC
Defendant:
SIKA AG, SIKA CORPORATION, CHRYSO, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
