Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 4:2008mc00016
Plaintiff:
Deborah D Peterson
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Decker v. Peterson et al
as 6:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Decker
Defendant:
Pete Peterson, Oklahoma Department of Health and Clifford Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florie v. Peterson et al
as 6:2007cv00390
Plaintiff:
Bryant S. Florie
Defendant:
Pete Peterson and Cliff Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florie v. Miller et al
as 6:2007cv00368
Plaintiff:
Bryant S. Florie
Defendant:
John Miller, Bill Peterson and Joe Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv01117
Plaintiff:
Shelly Faye Peterson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peterson et al v. Grisham et al
as 6:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
William N. Peterson, Gary L. Rogers, Gary Rogers and others
Defendant:
John Grisham, Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Random House, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Grant v. Callahan et al
as 5:2007cv00965
Plaintiff:
Delbert George Grant
Defendant:
Dennis Callahan, T C Peterson, Ken Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Peterson et al
as 5:2007cv00803
Petitioner:
Justin Ryan Long
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and T C Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00671
Plaintiff:
Oscar W Peterson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kelly et al v. Pontotoc County et al
as 6:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
Alfred Kelly, Alfred Kelly, Alfred Kelly and others
Defendant:
Pontotoc County, Pete Peterson, Pete Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
