Cases 71 - 80 of 134
Lee v. DBA et al
as 3:2015cv00805
Respondent:
Ron Brown, Judge Paula J. Brownhill, Clerks of Clatsop County Circuit Court and others
Petitioner:
David-Paul Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Walgreens Co.
as 3:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Josh Peterson
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
Peterson et al v. Grant County, et al
as 2:2015cv00216
Defendant:
Jeremy Boyer, Boyd Britton, City of Monument and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Peterson and Roy Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardizzone v. Burkeen et al
as 6:2014cv02033
Plaintiff:
George Ardizzone
Defendant:
Ryan Burkeen, Harry Carson, Joseph Guimond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong et al v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2014cv01709
Defendant:
Dave Burroughs, City of Eugene, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lynn Byers, Ronald L. Peterson, Rebecca Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roshone v. Harrison et al
as 2:2014cv01576
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Brooks, Bugher and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Roshone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of James Peterson, et al v. Sober, et al
as 6:2014cv01549
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Peterson and Betty Peterson
Defendant:
Marty Lopez and Jeffrey A. Sober
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01339
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peterson v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 6:2014cv01024
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kathleen J. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
