Cases 1 - 10 of 900
Peterson v. Snap Inc.
as 4:2024cv06499
Defendant:
Snap Inc.
Plaintiff:
Georgia Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKesson Corporation v. Caremeds Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01526
Defendant:
CAREMEDS PHARMACY, INC. and DARIN PETERSON
Plaintiff:
MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PS) Toepfer et al v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024cv02366
Plaintiff:
Pam Nelson, Robert Toepfer, Joan Alford and others
Defendant:
Dale Matsuoka, Natalie Peterson, Golden Boy Security Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Peterson
as 2:2024cv02338
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Peterson
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv01867
Defendant:
Caramello, Maciel, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Cristain Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Christopher M. Peterson v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv07004
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(PC) Bonilla v. Peterson
as 2:2024cv02219
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Alba-Pedilla v. Wesco Distribution Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03767
Defendant:
Wesco Distribution Inc. and Stand Peterson
Plaintiff:
Joel Jose De Alba-Pedilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
