Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Demarest v. Underhill et al
as 2:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Barbara Yerrick, Town of Underhill, Carolyn Gregson and others
Plaintiff:
David P. Demarest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Condos et al
as 2:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Reuell E. Peterson and Reuel E. Peterson
Defendant:
Jim Condos and Phil Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Scott et al
as 5:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Reuel E. Peterson
Defendant:
Phil Scott and Mark Levine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Scott
as 5:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Phil Scott
Plaintiff:
Revel E. Peterson and Reuel E. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mac Donald Gonzalez v. Peterson
as 2:2017cv00208
Petitioner:
Hector Guillermo Smith Mac Donald Gonzalez
Respondent:
Whitney Merlynn Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC et al v. Shumlin et al
as 1:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entery Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Peter Shumlin, William Sorrell and Mary N. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC et al v. Shumlin et al
as 5:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entery Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Peter Shumlin , William Sorrell and Mary N. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson-Dunn v. Cirignano et al
as 2:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kathline Peterson-Dunn
Defendant:
Jeffrey Cirignano and Berlin, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenney v. AMT Capital Partners, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Kenney
Defendant:
AMT Capital Partneres, Inc., Pyxis LLC, Lionhart (Canada), Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gentlewolf v. Peterson et al
as 1:2007cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jesse-Lynn V. Gentlewolf
Defendant:
Lars Peterson, Heidi Peterson, Thomas Drilling and Blasting Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
